Motivation for co-production of the public good:
conceptual reflections and research notes.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20401/rasi.8.2.582Abstract
The purpose of this article is to present and discuss the state of the art on citizens' motivations for the Co-production of the Public Good (CBP). The purpose is to identify the different aspects that motivate citizens to get involved in CBP, either in partnership with the State or with civil society organizations, as well as allowing the generation of new knowledge from these aspects. As a methodology, the research used an integrative literature review, through analysis of categorical content, in order to gather and synthesize the results of research that address aspects that motivate the citizen to be a co-producer of the public good. The motivational aspects presented in the synthesis matrix point out the different motivations for the citizen to participate in the CBP, leaving latent the complexity of the theme and how difficult it is to propose a single size model, because different forms of co-production may require different strategies to engage the public. Listing these aspects is relevant to public managers and civil society organizations, as they can guide the strategies to be used to engage citizens in CBP. Thus, they must adopt different strategies regarding the involvement of citizens in CBP, taking into account that each participant is unique and has different motivations. Based on the analyzed aspects, questions are presented that contribute to the formation of a research agenda, as well as assist public managers interested in the co-production of the public good as a management strategy.
Downloads
References
Age, L. M., Schommer, P. C. (2017). Coprodução de Serviço de Vigilância Sanitária: Certificação e Classificação de Restaurantes. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 21(3), 413-434. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2017170026
Alford, J. (2002). Why Do Public-Sector Clients Coproduce? Toward a Contingency Theory. Administration & Society, 34(1), 32–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399702034001004
Alford, J., Yates, S. (2016). Co?Production of Public Services in Australia: The Roles of Government Organizations and Co?Producers. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75: 159-175. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12157
Botelho, L. L. R., Cunha, C. C. de A., Macedo, M. (2011). O método da revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Gestão e Sociedade, 5(11), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.21171/ges.v5i11.1220
Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review, 67: 846-860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
Bovaird, T., Ryzin, V. G., Loeffler, E., Parrado, S. (2015). Activating Citizens to Participate in Collective Co-Production of Public Services. Journal of Social Policy, 44(1), 1-23. doi:10.1017/S0047279414000567
Bovaird, T., Stoker, G., Jones, T., Loeffler, E., Roncancio, P. M. (2016). Activating collective co-production of public services: influencing citizens to participate in complex governance mechanisms in the UK. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314566009
Brandsen, T., Pestoff, V. (2006) Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services, Public Management Review, 8:4, 493-501.
Brandsen, T., Honingh, M. (2016). Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions. Public Admin Rev, 76: 427-435. doi:10.1111/puar.12465
Brudney, J. L., England, R. E. (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 43(1), 59-65.
Chaebo, G., Medeiros, J. (2017). Participação direta em coprodução é democrática? Controle vetorial da dengue em Campo Grande – MS. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 22(71).
Fledderus, J. (2015). Does User Co-Production of Public Service Delivery Increase Satisfaction and Trust? Evidence From a Vignette Experiment. International Journal of Public Administration. 38. 1-12.
Fledderus, J., Honingh, M. (2015). Why People Co-Produce within Activation Services: The Necessity of Motivation and Trust—An Investigation of Selection Biases in a Municipal Activation Programme in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 82. 10.1177/0020852314566006.
Fledderus, J., Brandsen, T., Honingh, M. E. (2015). User co-production of public service delivery: An uncertainty approach. Public Policy and Administration, 30(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076715572362
Fontes?Filho, J. R (2014). “Da nova gestão pública à nova governança púbica: as novas exigências de profissionalização da função pública”. XIX Congresso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administración Pública, novembro, Quito, Ecuador.
Ganong L. H. (1987). Integrative reviews of nursing research. Research in nursing & health, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770100103
Klein Jr, V. H., Salm, J. F., Heidemann, F. G., Menegasso, M. E. (2012). Participação e coprodução em política habitacional: estudo de um programa de construção de moradias em SC. Revista de Administração Pública, 46(1), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122012000100003
O'Brien, D. T., Offenhuber, D., Baldwin P. J., Sands, M., Gordon, E. (2017). Uncharted territoriality in coproduction: The motivations for 311 reporting. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(2), 320–335.
Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
Parks, R.B., Baker, P.C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S.L., Vandivort, M.B., Whitaker, G.P., Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as coproducers of public services: some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9: 1001-1011. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x
Parrado, S., Gregg, G., Ryzin, V., Bovaird, T., Löffler, E. (2013). Correlates of Co-production: Evidence from a Five-Nation Survey of Citizens, International Public Management Journal, 16:1, 85-112, DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2013.796260
Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and third sector social services in Europe—Some crucial conceptual issues. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen , & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production (Chap. 2). London: Routledge
Petukiene, E., Tijunaitine, R., Damkuviene, M. (2012). Participation of clients in public services: the aspect of motivating. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 23(3), 301–309.
Ribeiro, A., Andion, C., Burigo, F. (2015). Ação coletiva e coprodução para o desenvolvimento rural: um estudo de caso do Colegiado de Desenvolvimento Territorial da Serra Catarinense. Revista de Administração Pública, 49(1), 119 a 140. http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rap/article/view/42967
Rocha, A., Schommer, P., Debetir, E., Pinheiro, D. (2019). Transparência como elemento da coprodução na pavimentação de vias públicas. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 24(78).
Ronconi, L. F. A., Debetir, E., Mattia, C. (2011). Conselhos Gestores de Políticas Públicas: potenciais espaços para a coprodução dos serviços públicos. Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 14(3), 46-59.
Salm, J. F. (2014) Coprodução de bens e serviços públicos. In: BOULLOSA, Rosana de Freitas (org.). Dicionário para a formação em gestão social. Salvador: CIAGS/UFBA, p. 42-44.
Salm, J. F.; Menegasso, M. E. (2010). Proposta de modelos para a coprodução do bem público a partir das tipologias de participação. Anais do XXXIV Enanpad.
Salm, J. F., Menegasso, M. E., Ribeiro, R. M. (2007). Co-produção do bem público e o desenvolvimento da cidadania: o caso do Proerd em Santa Catarina. Revista Alcance, 14(2), 231-246.
Schommer, P. C., Nunes, J. T., Moraes, R. L. (2012). Accountability, controle social e coprodução do bem público: a atuação de vinte observatórios sociais brasileiros voltados à cidadania e à educação fiscal. Publicações da Escola da AGU: Gestão Pública Democrática, Brasília, (4)18, 229-258.
Sharp, E. B. (1980). Toward a New Understanding of Urban Services and Citizen Participation: The Coproduction Concept. Midwest Review of Public Administration, 14(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507408001400203
Sicilia, M., Sancino, A., Nabatchi T., Guarini, E. (2019). Facilitating co-production in public services: management implications from a systematic literature review, Public Money & Management, 39:4, 233-240, DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1592904
Silva, F. A., Knoll, A., Moretto Neto, L. (2016). A Coprodução de Serviço Público na Reciclagem de Resíduos Sólidos: Estudo no Município de Florianópolis. Revista de Administração, Contabilidade e Economia da FUNDACE, 7(3), 64-76.
Soares, G., Farias, J. (2019). Com quem a escola pode contar? A coprodução do Ensino Fundamental público por familiares de estudantes. Revista de Administração Pública, 53(2), 310-330. Recuperado de http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rap/article/view/78496
Sundeen, R. (1988). “Explaining Participation in Co-Production – A Study of Volunteers.” Social Science Quarterly 69 (3): 547–568
Thijssen, P., Van Dooren, W. (2016). Who you are/where you live: do neighborhood characteristics explain co-production? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 88–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315570554
Tõnurist, P., L. Surva. (2017). “Is Volunteering Always Voluntary? between Compulsion and Coercion in Co-Production.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 28 (1): 223–247. doi:10.1007/s11266-016-9734-z
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Tuurnas, S. (2016). Looking beyond the Simplistic Ideals of Participatory Projects: Fostering Effective Co-production?, International Journal of Public Administration, 39:13, 1077-1087, DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2016.1178284
Uzochukwu, K., Thomas, J.C. (2018), Who Engages in the Coproduction of Local Public Services and Why? The Case of Atlanta, Georgia. Public Admin Rev, 78: 514-526. doi:10.1111/puar.12893
Van Eijk, C. J. A., Steen, T. P. S. (2014). Why People Co-Produce: Analyzing citizens’ perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services, Public Management Review, 16:3, 358-382, DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.841458
Van Eijk, C. J. A., Steen, T. P. S. (2016). Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314566007
Van Eijk, C. J. A., Steen, T. P. S. Verschuere, B. (2017). Co-Producing Safety in the Local Community: A Q-Methodology Study on the Incentives of Belgian and Dutch Members of Neighborhood Watch Schemes. Local Government Studies, (43, 3), 323–343.
Vanleene, D., Verschuere, B., Voets, J. (2015). Co-Producing a Nicer Neighborhood: Why Do People Participate in Community Development Projects? Paper presented at the IIAS Study Group on Co-Production, Nijmegen.
Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., Pestoff, V. (2012). “Co-Production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda.” Voluntas, 23 (4): 1083–1101. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8.
Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., Tummers, L. G. (2015). A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey, Public Management Review, 17:9, 1333-1357, DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
Whittemore, R., Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of advanced nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Review of Administration, Society and Innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RASI, in accordance with Law No. 9,610 of February 19, 1998, which amends, updates and consolidates Brazilian copyright law and makes other provisions, adopts the following conditions of the Copyright Assignment:
1. RASI maintains, with the transfer of copyrights, the possession of rights over the content published;
2. The author retains his moral rights of the content, including the right to be identified as the author whenever the content is published;
3. Despite the attribution of copyright, the author retains the right to reuse the material in future collections of his own work without encumbrance. The acknowledgments of the previous publication in the RASI are the only requirements in such cases;
4. The author may make photocopies of the content, or distribute it by electronic mail or fax, provided that they are intended for their own classes and for the purpose of meeting research objectives, provided that: (a) such copies are not resold and (b) reference to the original source of the publication and the name of the RASI are clearly indicated on all copies made of the document.
