Technological Entrepreneurship and Digital Peer-to-Peer Platforms of Shared Economy:
Approaches and Challenges for Managers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20401/rasi.8.3.580Keywords:
administrators, entrepreneurship, management, innovation, servicesAbstract
Peer-to-peer shared economy platforms have been connecting economic actors in digital media to offer services on-demand based on idle assets. The methodology is a result of a quali-quantitative triangulation based on bibliometric data and semi-structured interviews that aimed to analyze how these platforms have been studied and which are the main requirements to managers. The bibliographic data were obtained from the Web of Science main collection. Additionally, stakeholders in innovation ecosystems in Brazil and the United States of America were interviewed. The data were analyzed by their contents in three approaches: research fronts and intellectual base; digital peer-to-peer platforms of shared economy impacts; and challenges for management professionals. The results indicate six research fronts: business reformulation; consumption ways; work relationships; and new business models’ creation. In relation to stakeholders’ perspectives, it was possible to verify the concern about delivery and value creation; and professional capacitation decoupling under this digital business context.
Downloads
References
Alstyne, M. W. V, Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Pipelines, plataformas e novas regras de estratégia. Harvard Business Review, 94 (4), 32-40.
Barnes, S. J., & Mattsson, J. (2016). Understanding current and future issues in collaborative consumption: A four-stage Delphi study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 200-211.
Bastos, T. P., & Maia, P. A. (2019). Inovação em serviços e a economia do compartilhamento. Saraiva Educação SA.
Björkdahl, J. (2009). Technology cross-fertilization and the business model: The case of integrating ICTs in mechanical engineering products. Research policy, 38(9), 1468-1477.
Bloem, J., Van Doorn, M., Duivestein, S., Excoffier, D., Maas, R., & Van Ommeren, E. (2014). The fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the link between IT and OT (Report nº3). Recuperado de: htts://www.sogeti.com/globalassets/global/special/sogeti-things3en.pdf..
Boon, B. (2017). Bibliographic Research. In: M. ALLEN (Ed.). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 92-94). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377.
Cukier, D., Kon, F., & Krueger, N. (2015). Towards a software startup ecosystems maturity model. Department of Computer Science-University of São Paulo Technical Report RT-MAC.
Duffy, M. E. (1987). Methodological triangulation: a vehicle for merging quantitative and qualitative research methods. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 19(3), 130-133.
Franco, D. S., & Ferraz, D. L. D. S. (2019). Uberização do trabalho e acumulação capitalista. Cadernos EBAPE. BR, 17(SPE), 844-856.
Frazão, A. (2017). O poder das plataformas digitais - O que são e quais as suas repercussões sobre a regulação jurídica? Recuperado de: <https://www.jota.info/paywall?redirect_to=//www.jota.info/opiniao-eanalise/colunas/constituicao-empresa-e-mercado/o-poder-das-plataformas-digitais-11072017>.
Frenken, K., & Schor, J. (2019). Putting the sharing economy into perspective. In A Research Agenda for Sustainable Consumption Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hagiu, A., & Rothman, S. (2016). Network effects aren't enough.
Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2018). Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research Policy, 47(8), 1391-1399.
Jakovljevic, M. M., & Pejcic, A. V. (2017). Growth of global publishing output of health economics in the twenty-first century: a bibliographic insight. Frontiers in public health, 5, 211.
Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative science quarterly, 24(4), 602-611.
Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard business review, 86(12), 57-68.
Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in science and technology, 32(3), 61.
Kohlbacher, F. (2006). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1-30). Institut für Qualitative Forschung.
Kopalle, P. K., Kumar, V., & Subramaniam, M. (2020). How legacy firms can embrace the digital ecosystem via digital customer orientation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 114-131.
Kumar, V., & Srivastava, R. (2019). New perspectives on business model innovations in emerging markets. Recuperado de: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11747-019-00713-2>. Acesso em: 04 jul. 2020.
Lemos, C. (2009). Inovação na era do conhecimento. Parcerias estratégicas, 5(8), 157-180.
Liu, W., Gu, M., Hu, G., Li, C., Liao, H., Tang, L., & Shapira, P. (2014). Profile of developments in biomass-based bioenergy research: a 20-year perspective. Scientometrics, 99(2), 507-521.
Morrish, S. C., Whyte, M. C., & Miles, M. P. (2019). Incubator mediation in commercialising disruptive innovation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 27(2), 177-189.
Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. WW Norton & Company.
Piscicelli, L., Ludden, G. D., & Cooper, T. (2018). What makes a sustainable business model successful? An empirical comparison of two peer-to-peer goods-sharing platforms. Journal of cleaner production, 172, 4580-4591.
Porter, A. L., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Schoeneck, D. J. (2008). Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of nanoparticle research, 10(5), 715-728.
Rampasso, I. S., Mello, S. L., Walker, R., Simão, V. G., Araújo, R., Chagas, J., ... & Anholon, R. (2020). An investigation of research gaps in reported skills required for Industry 4.0 readiness of Brazilian undergraduate students. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning. Recuperado de: <https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/HESWBL-10-2019-0131/full/html>.
Richardson, L. (2015). Performing the sharing economy. Geoforum, 67, 121-129.
Serrano, P. H. S. M., & Baldanza, R. F. (2017). Tecnologias disruptivas: o caso do Uber. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, 11(5), 37-48.
Subramaniam, M., Iyer, B., & Venkatraman, V. (2019). Competing in digital ecosystems. Business Horizons, 62(1), 83-94.
Sundararajan, A. (2017). The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. Mit Press.
Tiago, E. (2018). Mapa da Inovação - Dificuldade em juntar pontos. Valor (Especial) - Inovação, out., 18-22.
Todolí-Signes, A. (2017). The ‘gig economy’: employee, self-employed or the need for a special employment regulation?. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 193-205.
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS quarterly, xiii-xxiii.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Review of Administration, Society and Innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RASI, in accordance with Law No. 9,610 of February 19, 1998, which amends, updates and consolidates Brazilian copyright law and makes other provisions, adopts the following conditions of the Copyright Assignment:
1. RASI maintains, with the transfer of copyrights, the possession of rights over the content published;
2. The author retains his moral rights of the content, including the right to be identified as the author whenever the content is published;
3. Despite the attribution of copyright, the author retains the right to reuse the material in future collections of his own work without encumbrance. The acknowledgments of the previous publication in the RASI are the only requirements in such cases;
4. The author may make photocopies of the content, or distribute it by electronic mail or fax, provided that they are intended for their own classes and for the purpose of meeting research objectives, provided that: (a) such copies are not resold and (b) reference to the original source of the publication and the name of the RASI are clearly indicated on all copies made of the document.
